An Anthropologist on Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales by …

نوشته شده در موضوع خرید اینترنتی در ۲۲ آذر ۱۳۹۴

If we were to generalize about Oliver Sacks’s collection of essays entitled, An Anthropologist on Mars, we suspect we would contend it confronts a startling operation of tellurian phenomena that are deliberate abnormal…but might not be.

Most people knowledge some form of obsessional meditative or compulsive function during some indicate in their lives; many people are inexplicably “good” during certain things and “bad” during others; many people have romantic blind spots and insensitivities; and many people consider they see with their eyes, not their brains.

Taken to extremes and strong in singular ways these qualities beget what Sacks and others call simpleton savants, prodigies, autistic people and people who “suffer” from Tourette’s Syndrome.

This is what Sacks writes about: extremes. Multiply your uncle’s quirky approach of repeating what we contend to him 100 times and we have someone who is manifesting echolalia. Think behind on how many times we have returned to check on a doorway we know you’ve locked…imagine yourself doing this 100 times… and you’ve got compulsivity (the same thing goes with hand-washing, or certain phobias, or other class of undiscerning psycho-physical behavior).

One figure in this book can demeanour during a cityscape for 5 seconds, go to his apartment, lay down and drawn all a buildings he’s seen in that quick glance with startling accuracy. What he can’t do is rivet in something that shows adult in many of Sacks’s box studies: describe his biased self to your biased self. He is alone with his perceptions some-more than with his feelings. His inter-connectedness is not a same as many people’s.

Another figure in a book obsessively paints, in agonizing detail, a encampment in Italy where he grew adult 25 years ago. He sees that encampment in 3-D while operative in his garage in California, and he’s got to record it from each angle and perspective, throwing all a constructional facilities and a approach each mill “used to look.” When he revisits a village, a stones don’t demeanour that approach anymore and a encampment is only about dead. That’s tough on him. But after 10 days shock, he earnings to his aged task: recreating a images of his childhood again and again and again.

What are we to make of this? Again, I’d contention there’s some of it in all of us, and it’s fascinating. A surgeon with Tourette’s Syndrome good out uncanny noises and drumming his conduct and clicking his heels and creation humorous faces…who becomes really focused and consultant in a handling room? Not possible? Yes, possible…and engaging to encounter.

Even some-more engaging is a substantial doubt Sacks’s systematic observations raise: are we, in a some-more “normal” feeling, subjective, integrated mode simply rarely functioning spur conglomerations of matter…or is there some addition suggestion or essence that pulls us together…while unwell to do so for people who are autistic?

I was rather dismayed to review that Picasso pronounced something to a outcome that artists are done rather than born. If we demeanour during his drawings from childhood, you’d consider he was a innate artist, though in comparison to a artistic expert famous as Nadia, maybe Picasso had a point.

On a other hand, if Nadia and others could furnish striking gems during very, really early ages, wasn’t she innate with this gift? And if she had a gift, don’t we all? And if we all have it, how could we serve it…or maintain it…or during slightest not conceal and hurt it by a required upbringing?

The final letter in a book, “An Anthropologist on Mars,” focuses on a famous autistic scientist, Temple Grandin. What she possesses is measureless technical and pattern skill, an affinity for animals, and a good understanding of difficulty when it comes to “relating” to tellurian beings. She doesn’t conflict to other people so many as try to figure them out; she does a flattering good pursuit of it, though her romantic life appears utterly constrained. For her there will be no lover, no children. There only won’t be. She knows she doesn’t get that kind of relationship, and she’s created it off.

Again, if Temple can feel strongly about cows and pigs, and pattern mechanisms to urge their lives as they are fattened for death, though doesn’t feel utterly so strongly about tellurian beings, does she miss something soulful? Something many of us would not caring to obey to be as intelligent as she is?

Sacks doesn’t have an answer for these questions other than to indicate out that amiability is not a homogenized, ideally developed unity…nor should anyone feel ostracized for possessing some gifts to such an extent, roughly over comprehension, that they miss others.

This is a really good book, really value reading. It’s about tellurian nature. It’s about us.

For some-more of my comments on contemporary writing, see Tuppence Reviews (Kindle).

Article source: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/64666.An_Anthropologist_on_Mars

پاسخ دهید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد.

*

code