Strange loop

نوشته شده در موضوع خرید اینترنتی در 24 فوریه 2016

A strange loop arises when, by relocating usually upwards or downwards by a hierarchical system, one finds oneself behind to where one started.

Strange loops might engage self-reference and paradox. The judgment of a bizarre loop was due and extensively discussed by Douglas Hofstadter in Gödel, Escher, Bach, and is serve elaborated in Hofstadter’s book I Am a Strange Loop, published in 2007.

A tangled hierarchy is a hierarchical alertness complement in that a bizarre loop appears.


A bizarre loop is a hierarchy of levels, any of that is related to during slightest one other by some form of relationship. A bizarre loop hierarchy, however, is “tangled” (Hofstadter refers to this as a “heterarchy”), in that there is no good tangible top or lowest level; relocating by a levels, one eventually earnings to a starting point, i.e., a bizarre level. Examples of bizarre loops that Hofstadter offers include: many of a works of M. C. Escher, a information upsurge network between DNA and enzymes by protein singularity and DNA replication, and self-referential Gödelian statements in grave systems.

In I Am a Strange Loop, Hofstadter defines bizarre loops as follows:

And nonetheless when we contend “strange loop”, we have something else in mind — a reduction concrete, some-more fugitive notion. What we meant by “strange loop” is — here goes a initial stab, anyway — not a earthy circuit though an epitome loop in which, in a array of stages that consecrate a cycling-around, there is a change from one spin of condensation (or structure) to another, that feels like an upwards transformation in a hierarchy, and nonetheless somehow a unbroken “upward” shifts spin out to give arise to a sealed cycle. That is, notwithstanding one’s clarity of vacating ever serve from one’s origin, one winds up, to one’s shock, accurately where one had started out. In short, a bizarre loop is a enigmatic level-crossing feedback loop. (pp. 101-102)

In cognitive science[edit]

Strange loops take form in tellurian alertness as a complexity of active black in a mind fundamentally leads to a same kind of self-reference that Gödel valid was fundamental in any formidable judicious or arithmetical complement in his incompleteness theorem.[1] Gödel showed that arithmetic and explanation enclose bizarre loops: propositions that not usually impute to mathematical and judicious truths, though also to a illustration systems expressing those truths. This leads to a arrange of paradoxes seen in statements such as “This matter is false,” wherein a sentence’s basement of law is found in referring to itself and a assertion, causing a judicious paradox.[2]

Hofstadter argues that a psychological self arises out of a identical kind of paradox. We are not innate with an ‘I’ – a ego emerges usually gradually as knowledge shapes a unenlightened web of active black into a tapestry abounding and formidable adequate to start rambling behind on itself. According to this viewpoint a psychological ‘I’ is a account fiction, something combined usually from intake of mystic information and a possess ability to emanate stories about itself from that data. The effect is that a viewpoint (a mind) is a perfection of a singular settlement of mystic activity in a shaken systems, that suggests that a settlement of mystic activity that creates identity, that constitutes subjectivity, can be replicated within a smarts of others, and maybe even in synthetic brains.[2]


The “strangeness” of a bizarre loop comes from a approach of perception, since we specify a submit in a tiny series of ‘symbols’ (by that Hofstadter means groups of neurons station for one thing in a outward world). So a disproportion between a video-feedback loop and a bizarre loops, a “I”s, is that while a former translates light to a same settlement on a screen, a latter categorizes a settlement and outputs a essence, so that as we get closer and closer to a essence, we get serve down a bizarre loop.[3]

Downward causality[edit]

Hofstadter thinks a minds seem to us to establish a universe by approach of “downward causality”, that refers to a conditions where a cause-and-effect attribute in a complement gets flipped upside-down. Hofstadter says this happens in a explanation of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem:

Merely from meaningful a formula’s meaning, one can infer a law or mendacity but any bid to get it in a out-of-date way, that requires one to walk methodically “upwards” from a axioms. This is not only peculiar; it is astonishing. Normally, one can't merely demeanour during what a mathematical surmise says and simply interest to a calm of that matter on a possess to ascertain either a matter is loyal or false. (pp. 169-170)

Hofstadter claims a identical “flipping around of causality” appears to occur in minds possessing self-consciousness. The mind perceives itself as a means of certain feelings, (“I” am a source of my desires), while according to renouned systematic models, feelings and desires are particularly caused by a interactions of neurons.


This territory needs additional citations for verification. Please assistance urge this essay by adding citations to arguable sources. Unsourced element might be challenged and removed. (December 2015)

Hofstadter points to Bach’s Canon per Tonos, M. C. Escher’s drawings Waterfall, Drawing Hands, Ascending and Descending, and a liar antithesis as examples that illustrate a thought of bizarre loops, that is voiced entirely in a explanation of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem.

The “chicken or a egg” antithesis is maybe a best-known bizarre loop problem.

The “ouroboros”, that depicts a dragon eating a possess tail, is maybe one of a many ancient and judgment mystic representations of a reflexive loop concept.

A Shepard tinge is another scholastic instance of a bizarre loop. Named after Roger Shepard, it is a sound consisting of a superposition of tones distant by octaves. When played with a bottom illustration of a tinge relocating upwards or downwards, it is referred to as a Shepard scale. This creates a heard apparition of a tinge that ceaselessly ascends or descends in pitch, nonetheless that eventually seems to get no aloft or lower. See Barber’s pole.

Problems personification this file? See media help.

Another low-pitched instance can be found in a soundtrack themes of many early Sonic a Hedgehog games; designed to support a game’s design of speed and consistent acceleration, a songs seem to grow invariably in intensity, notwithstanding a fact that they are indeed on a continual loop.

A quine in module programming is a module that produces a new chronicle of itself but any submit from a outside. A identical judgment is metamorphic code.

Efron’s bones are 4 bones that are intransitive underneath gambler’s preference. In other words, a bones are systematic A B C D A, where x y means “a gambler prefers x to y“.

The liar antithesis and Russell’s antithesis also engage bizarre loops, as does René Magritte’s portrayal The Treachery of Images.

The mathematical materialisation of polysemy has been celebrated to be a bizarre loop. At a denotational level, a tenure refers to situations where a singular entity can be seen to mean some-more than one mathematical object. See Tanenbaum (1999).

The Stonecutter is an aged Japanese angel story with a story that explains amicable and healthy hierarchies as a bizarre loop.

The “flavor text” of a Magic a Gathering label “Squandered Resources” is an mention from a fictitious physique of folklore, revelation a brief story of a merchant’s cursed bid during attaining wealth: “He traded silt for goods, products for gold, bullion for life. In a end, he traded life for sand.”

See also[edit]


  • Tanenbaum, P. J. (October 1999). 1097-0118 “Simultaneous intersection illustration of pairs of graphs” Check |url= value (help). Journal of Graph Theory 32 (2): 171–190. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0118(199910)32:2171::AID-JGT73.0.CO;2-N. Retrieved 2010-09-29. 


Related topics

Article source:

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید